Skip to main content
· 7/11/1991

Christian v. Sizemore

Citations

  • 407 S.E.2d 715
  • 185 W. Va. 409
  • 1991 W. Va. LEXIS 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Collateral estoppel is essentially a doctrine which precludes the relitigation of an issue, while res judicata precludes relitigation of the same cause of action.” (emphasis added)
  • “issues are not actually litigated in a default judgment action and, consequently, [...] default judgments are not appropriate foundations for the application of collateral estoppel”
  • “issues are not actually litigated in a default judgment action and, consequently, […] default judgments are not appropriate foundations for the application of collateral estoppel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Workman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.