Skip to main content

Christensen v. Hoover

Citations

  • 643 P.2d 525
  • 1982 Colo. LEXIS 582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding curbside drop of tenants property permissible even though theft will likely result
  • finding it to be the officer’s duty under a writ of restitution “not only to remove the tenant, but also to remove the tenant’s personal property and effects” where unlawful detainer statute provided that landlord was entitled to restitution, or full possession, of the premises
  • no agreement is necessary to create a bailment; once created, a bailee's duty is imposed by law
  • “Once a bailment relationship has been established, the law imposes upon the bailee certain duties and obligations with respect to the bailed property in his possession.”
  • \Defenses and objections not presented at trial are deemed waived . . . .\
  • the law imposes upon the bailee the duty to exercise reasonable care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Christensen v. Hoover

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.