· 4/15/1991
Dove v. Delgado
Citations
- 808 P.2d 1270
- 15 Brief Times Rptr. 501
- 1991 Colo. LEXIS 219
- 1991 WL 55374
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding “reliance on settlement discussion with [the] insurer to be an unreasonable justification for failing to file within the requisite period of time”
- \The doctrine of estoppel is not favored ... and will be applied only when all of the elements constituting an estoppel are clearly shown.\
- statutes of limitation bar claims “that have been allowed to slumber until evidence has been lost, memories have faded, and witnesses have disappeared”
- “It is . . . clearly within the legislature’s domain to amend statutes of limitations to shorten or lengthen the time after which certain actions shall not be brought.”
- “The doctrine of estoppel is not favored . . . and will be applied only when all of the elements constituting an estoppel are clearly shown.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vollack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.