Oregon Supreme Court· 10/23/1979
Christensen v. Epley
Citations
- 601 P.2d 1216
- 287 Or. 539
- 1979 Ore. LEXIS 1197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- this court could not agree on the applicability of the special relationship rule
- allocation of personnel and determination of what qualifications are necessary in order to perform particular job involves policy considerations that are discretionary acts of government for purposes of governmental immunity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Linde, Peterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Buchler v. Oregon Corrections Div.Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-04· cited 120×
- Cansler v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-01-05· cited 92×
- Chapman v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court· 2015-11-13· cited 67×
- Christensen v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 66×
- Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-05-27· cited 64×
- Cain v. RijkenOregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-08· cited 57×
- Genoa M. White v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1986-01-03· cited 53×
- Hilt v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-10-02· cited 39×
- Wise v. Valley BankMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-12-31· cited 25×
- Mississippi Medicaid Pharmaceutical Average Wholesale Price Litigation v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2015-10-29· cited 19×
- Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-06-22· cited 18×
- Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-05-05· cited 15×
- Matter of Estate of WhiteOregon Supreme Court· 1980-04-08· cited 12×
- Evans v. Salem HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-17· cited 11×
- Yanzick v. TawneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-01-14· cited 10×
- Itami v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-15· cited 10×
- Bilderback v. United StatesD. Oregon· 1982-10-22· cited 10×
- Cain v. RijkenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-06-05· cited 6×
- Buchler v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Corrections DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-12· cited 5×
- Knipp v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-07-21· cited 5×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-27· cited 205×
- Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court· 1970-05-28· cited 150×
- Williams v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals· 1955-06-02· cited 101×
- James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-04-19· cited 80×
- Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-09-22· cited 76×
- State v. SilvaNevada Supreme Court· 1970-12-28· cited 68×
- Dewey v. A. F. Klaveness & Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-03-13· cited 59×
- Frank v. PitreSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-12-19· cited 46×
- Green v. STATE, DEPT. OF HWYS.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1956-11-26· cited 45×
- Hills v. McGillvreyOregon Supreme Court· 1965-06-03· cited 42×
- Kirby v. SonvilleOregon Supreme Court· 1979-05-08· cited 39×
- Webb v. STATE, DEPT. OF INSTITUTIONSLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1956-11-26· cited 36×
- Goheen v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court· 1972-09-21· cited 33×
- West Virginia v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkS.D. West Virginia· 1967-01-07· cited 29×
- Cramer v. MengerhausenOregon Supreme Court· 1976-06-04· cited 26×
- Ballard v. Rickabaugh Orchards, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-06-16· cited 26×
- Rum River Lumber Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-07-27· cited 25×
- Allen v. ShiromaOregon Supreme Court· 1973-09-27· cited 20×
- Thomas v. InmanOregon Supreme Court· 1978-05-02· cited 19×
- Sworden v. GrossOregon Supreme Court· 1966-01-19· cited 19×
Other cases named Christensen v. Epley
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.