Skip to main content

Christensen v. Epley

Citations

  • 601 P.2d 1216
  • 287 Or. 539
  • 1979 Ore. LEXIS 1197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • this court could not agree on the applicability of the special relationship rule
  • allocation of personnel and determination of what qualifications are necessary in order to perform particular job involves policy considerations that are discretionary acts of government for purposes of governmental immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Linde, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Christensen v. Epley

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.