Cain v. Rijken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f Providence [Medical Center] had knowledge of Rijken’s illness, past actions and condition at the time of the injury, it would have notice that reckless driving could be a foreseeable consequence of Rijken’s disease.” (Emphasis added.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Perreira v. State
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1989-02-06· cited 99×
• Cain v. Rijken
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-08· cited 57×
• Genoa M. White v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1986-01-03· cited 53×
• Johnson v. Village of Libertyville
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-08-13· cited 15×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California
  California Supreme Court· 1976-07-01· cited 1,035×
• Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-10-05· cited 170×
• Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood Company
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1970-05-28· cited 150×
• Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  D. Nebraska· 1980-07-17· cited 109×
• Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-09-22· cited 76×
• Christensen v. Epley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-10-23· cited 48×
• Cramer v. Mengerhausen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-06-04· cited 26×
• Christensen v. Epley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-10-16· cited 17×