Skip to main content
· 2/15/1995

Chopra v. Hawryluk

Citations

  • 892 S.W.2d 229
  • 1995 WL 12591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a conclusory affidavit failed to address the affiant’s diagnosis of the plaintiffs mammogram as negative for cancer or to otherwise explain why a reasonably prudent radiologist would have come to the same conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barajas, Larsen, Preslar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.