Second Circuit· 3/29/2018

Choi v. Tower Research Capital LLC

Citations

890 F.3d 60

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a claim for unjust enrichment under New York law requires “the plaintiff to establish: (1) that the defendant benefitted; (2) at the plaintiff’s expense; and (3) that equity and good conscience require restitution.”
concluding that night-market trades on a Korean exchange, which were matched by the CME in the United States, were domestic transactions because the trades became irrevocable at the moment of matching}; Suiivan v. Barclays PLC, No. 13-cv- 2811 (PKC
holding that KRX night market trades “matched” in the United States and “cleared and settled” in Korea were domestic transactions within the meaning of Morrison based on plaintiffs’ allegation that the trades were binding on the parties “on matching”
stating that a claim for unjust enrichment under New York law requires “the plaintiff to establish: (1) that the defendant benefitted; (2) at the plaintiff’s expense; and (3) that equity and good conscience require restitution”
stating that Morrison’s “domestic transactions” test applies to the CEA
characterizing unjust enrichment as “a New York common law quasi-contract cause of action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lohier, Pooler, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Choi v. Tower Research Capital LLC

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.