Chisley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that an eyewitness identification was sufficient to sustain a robbery conviction, despite a variance between the date alleged in the indictment and the date shown in the testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mulkey
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-07-06· cited 40×
• Burkett v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-07· cited 14×
• Stackhouse v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-06-07· cited 12×
• West v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-02-14· cited 7×
• Pisani v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
  D. Maryland· 1968-09-16· cited 4×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Fulton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-12-07· cited 10×