Childs v. Franco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he scope of judicial admissions is restricted to matters of fact which otherwise would require evidentiary proof.”
• district court granted new trial because of fundamental error in unobjected-to jury instructions, because appellate standards were applicable when trial court reviewed its own instructions on postverdict motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).