Skip to main content
· 7/25/2008

Child v. Lomax

Citations

  • 188 P.3d 1103
  • 124 Nev. 600
  • 124 Nev. Adv. Rep. 57
  • 2008 Nev. LEXIS 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a writ petition relating to the term-limits provisions applicable to members of the Nevada State Assembly presented a question of statewide significance
  • holding that statute authorizing one to challenge a candidate’s qualifications within five days did not eliminate right to challenge qualifications through an original proceeding for writ of mandamus
  • emphasizing procedural differences and different forms of relief available in an election contest as compared to an original proceeding for writ of mandamus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibbons, Maupin, Hardesty, Parraguirre, Douglas, Cherry, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.