Supreme Court· 1/14/2021
Chicago v. Fulton
Citations
- 592 U.S. 154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the “canon against surplusage . . . strong[ly]” disfavors “interpretation[s] [that] would render superfluous another part of the same statutory scheme” (citation omitted)
- finding no stay violation under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(3) because mere retention of estate property does not constitute an act to exercise control
- rejecting “an interpretation [that] would render superfluous another part of the same statutory scheme” (citation omitted)
- “The canon against surplusage is strongest when an interpretation would render superfluous another part of the same statutory scheme.”
- the automatic stay 10 “benefits creditors as a group by preventing individual creditors from pursuing their own interests 11 to the detriment of the others”
- “The canon against surplusage is strongest when an interpretation would render superfluous another part of the same statutory scheme.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Samuel Alito
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Banco Popular de Puerto Rico v. Gómez Alayón y otrosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2023-12-19· cited 243×
- Pulsifer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2024-03-15· cited 1×
- American Warrior v. Foundation EnergyFifth Circuit· 2024-08-01· cited 1×
- Simon Quito-Guachichulca v. Merrick B. GarlandEighth Circuit· 2024-12-09· cited 1×
- In re: Lenore L. Albert-SheridanNinth Circuit· 2024-04-02
- In Re: Windstream Holdings, Inc.Second Circuit· 2024-06-24
- United States v. Sharmake AbdullahiEighth Circuit· 2025-07-21
- State of Iowa v. Chris WrightEighth Circuit· 2025-09-05
- Ryan O'Donnell v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2025-12-22
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 5,972×
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-04-22· cited 3,500×
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 1,643×
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court· 1906-02-19· cited 1,300×
- Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court· 2007-02-21· cited 843×
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court· 1995-10-31· cited 594×
- Bullard v. Blue Hills BankSupreme Court· 2015-05-04· cited 476×
- In Re John Rothwell Knaus, Debtor. John Rothwell Knaus v. Concordia Lumber Company, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1989-11-13· cited 184×
- Thompson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., LLCSeventh Circuit· 2009-05-27· cited 70×
- Weber v. SEFCU (In Re Weber)Second Circuit· 2013-05-08· cited 32×
- City of Chicago v. Timothy ShannonSeventh Circuit· 2019-06-19· cited 28×
- WD Equipment, LLC v. CowenTenth Circuit· 2017-02-27· cited 26×
- Joy Denby-Peterson v.Third Circuit· 2019-10-28· cited 22×
- In Re KuehnSeventh Circuit· 2009-04-16· cited 18×
- Fitzgerald v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Larimer)D. Idaho· 1983-02-22· cited 7×
- Reid v. Citadel Financial Credit Union (In Re Reid)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-01-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.