Illinois Supreme Court· 2/17/1899
Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Rouse
Citations
- 178 Ill. 132
- 44 L.R.A. 410
- 52 N.E. 951
- 1899 Ill. LEXIS 2784
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “all that pertains merely to the remedy will be controlled by the law of the State where the action is brought” in both tort and contract cases (emphasis omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Opp v. PryorIllinois Supreme Court· 1920-10-23· cited 86×
- Maloney v. Winston Bros.Idaho Supreme Court· 1910-05-09· cited 41×
- Insull v. New York World-Telegram CorporationN.D. Illinois· 1959-04-08· cited 40×
- Hardman v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1964-03-11· cited 40×
- Reynolds v. DayWashington Supreme Court· 1914-05-06· cited 38×
- Reighley v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1945-03-21· cited 31×
- Dougherty v. American McKenna Process Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1912-10-26· cited 29×
- Millsap v. Central Wisconsin Motor Transport Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1963-05-07· cited 26×
- Morrisette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1904-02-15· cited 20×
- Clara R. Hartness, Administratrix of the Estate of Walter William Hartness, Deceased v. Aldens, Inc., and Starbrand CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1962-05-01· cited 7×
- Kalmich v. BrunoN.D. Illinois· 1975-10-14· cited 7×
- Herrmann v. Franlkin Ice Cream Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1926-03-19· cited 6×
- Brennan v. Electrical Installation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1905-05-01· cited 5×
- Henning v. HillIndiana Court of Appeals· 1923-10-05· cited 5×
- Torcazo v. StatemaN.D. Illinois· 1956-05-08· cited 2×
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperFirst Circuit· 1931-01-08· cited 2×
- Schultz v. Sinav Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2024-04-05· cited 2×
- Fitzgerald v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1909-10-25· cited 1×
- I. S. Ginsburg v. Adams Express Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1911-04-07
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court· 1894-05-26· cited 191×
- Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1883-07-11· cited 116×
- Higgins v. Central New England & Western RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1892-01-06· cited 66×
- Burns v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court· 1888-01-24· cited 55×
- Anderson v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1875-01-15· cited 21×
- Walsh v. New York & New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1894-03-01· cited 20×
- Railway Co. v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court· 1890-10-04· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.