Skip to main content

Chew v. State

Citations

  • 855 P.2d 1120
  • 121 Or. App. 474
  • 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defense counsel not required \to predict their client's future criminal activities and inform them of the potential consequences of such activity\
  • “Petitioner must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he would not have pleaded guilty if his attorney had properly advised him.”
  • counsel’s inadequate assistance must prejudice the defense before a defendant is entitled to relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, Riggs, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.