S.D. Illinois· 6/27/2018
Chevron Corp. v. Donziger
Citations
- 325 F. Supp. 3d 371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “leave of court [is] not required to conduct post-judgment discovery with respect to enforcement of the monetary portion of [a] judgment”
- noting that “leave of court [is] not required to conduct post-judgment discovery with respect to enforcement of the monetary portion of [a] judgment”
- “It is well established, of course, that arguments first raised in reply briefs are forfeited or waived.”
- “It is well established, of course, that arguments first raised in reply briefs are forfeited or waived.”
- “[T]he bribery and other corruption . . . removed any shield that the First Amendment otherwise would have provided.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Second Circuit· 2010-04-29· cited 2,656×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 2,614×
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Second Circuit· 1995-11-15· cited 2,273×
- Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 1,000×
- Dow Jones & Company, Inc. v. Harrods Limited, and Mohamed Al FayedSecond Circuit· 2003-10-10· cited 189×
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerSecond Circuit· 2016-08-08· cited 118×
- Knipe v. SkinnerSecond Circuit· 1993-07-30· cited 91×
- Harrison v. Republic of SudanSecond Circuit· 2016-09-22· cited 71×
- Duling v. Gristede's Operating Corp.S.D. New York· 2010-03-30· cited 55×
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerS.D. New York· 2014-03-04· cited 49×
- Huthnance v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2008-12-15· cited 21×
- The State of New York, Cross-Appellant v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald Leogrande, Cross-AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1985-05-07· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.