Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/29/1969
Cherry v. State
Citations
- 447 S.W.2d 154
- 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 890
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that enhancement penalty statutes do not result in double jeopardy violations
- explaining that enhancement penalty statutes do not result in double jeopardy violations
- explaining that enhancement penalty statutes do not result in double jeopardy violations
- explaining that enhancement penalty statutes do not result in double jeopardy violations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Onion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wingo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2004-06-16· cited 43×
- Diamond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-19· cited 38×
- Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-02-23· cited 29×
- Schultz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-06-12· cited 26×
- Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1987-05-21· cited 22×
- Thrash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-07· cited 21×
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-10-06· cited 18×
- Armendariz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-11-12· cited 14×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-06-23· cited 13×
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-03-28· cited 12×
- Shivers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-13· cited 9×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-02-03· cited 8×
- Franks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-01-27· cited 8×
- Salazar v. TowerTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1984-12-13· cited 8×
- Ex Parte CherryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-07-08· cited 6×
- Strader v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-06-14· cited 2×
- Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-06-17· cited 1×
- Lake Olympia Development, N v. D/B/A AFG Lake Olympia, Inc. v. Bayer Homes, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-10-10
- Tom Richard Doyle, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-11-29
- Stephaine Espinosa v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2006-03-08
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1966-11-21· cited 1,416×
- Trammell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-06-25· cited 49×
- Branch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-06-18· cited 47×
- Harrington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-01-03· cited 43×
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-01-31· cited 25×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-03-18· cited 24×
- Ex Parte ReyesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-11-11· cited 23×
- Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-06-15· cited 21×
- MacKie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-03-27· cited 21×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-06-22· cited 20×
- Kanaziz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-06-10· cited 18×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-10-23· cited 18×
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-04-05· cited 17×
- Schmeideberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-05-03· cited 16×
- Spencer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1965-03-17· cited 16×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-03-18· cited 13×
- Dickey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-05-04· cited 11×
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-12-14· cited 8×
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-04-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.