Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Michigan Court of Appeals· 6/18/2015

Cheesman v. Williams

Citations

  • 311 Mich. App. 147
  • 874 N.W.2d 385
  • 2015 Mich. App. LEXIS 1291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[t]his Court will not search for authority to sustain or reject a party’s position”
  • concluding that “[t]his Court will not search for authority to sustain or reject a party’s position”
  • noting that the record failed to indicate that the trial court had considered all of the factors required under MCL 722.1207(2)
  • explaining that an appellant must sufficiently present an issue on appeal before this Court will address it
  • stating that “[a]n appellant may not merely announce a position then leave it to this Court to discover and rationalize the basis for the appellant’s claims . . . .”
  • “An appellant may not merely announce a position then leave it to this Court to discover and rationalize the basis for the appellant’s claims[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Owens, Gleicher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.