Chavez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the Court of Criminal Appeals said that it has “consistently acknowledged that the introduction of extraneous offenses to the jury is inherently ‘prejudicial’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McGee v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-06-15· cited 12×
• Mosley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1996-08-29· cited 9×
• Robert Charles Hines v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2014-09-26

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Montgomery v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 7,264×
• McKenzie v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-05-20· cited 454×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-12-21· cited 274×
• Elkins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-30· cited 116×
• Saenz v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-11-25· cited 70×
• Berryhill v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-14· cited 58×
• Henson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-12-12· cited 32×
• McDaniel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-18· cited 32×
• Lacy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1989-12-28· cited 12×