Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/1/1999
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Gavin
Citations
- 249 Conn. 172
- 733 A.2d 782
- 1999 Conn. LEXIS 155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the connection for the inter vivos trust was the fact a noncontingent beneficiary was an in-state resident during the tax year in question
- noting the connection for the inter vivos trust was the fact a noncontingent beneficiary was an in-state resident during the tax year in question
- noting the connection for the inter vivos trust was the fact a noncontingent beneficiary was an in-state resident during the tax year in question
- Resident trusts as defined in General Statutes § 12-701 (a
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Borden, McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lehman Bros. Bank, FSB v. State Bank CommissionerSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-11-09· cited 17×
- Willacy v. Cleveland Bd. of Income Tax Rev. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-02-04· cited 9×
- Linn v. The Deparrtment of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-02-11· cited 8×
- Residuary Trust A v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court· 2013-01-03· cited 4×
- Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust v. N.C. Dep't of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-06-08· cited 3×
- Robert L. McNeil, Jr. Trust ex rel. McNeil v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-24· cited 3×
- Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust v. N.C. Dep't of RevenueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-07-05· cited 2×
- Alico, LLC v. SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-12-19· cited 1×
- MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. v. MalloySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-02-23
- Fielding v. Comm'r of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-07-18
- Trust Under Will of Ashton, A.; Apl of: Reed, E.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-10-04
- The Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust v. North Carolina Dep't of RevenueNorth Carolina Business Court· 2015-04-23
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court· 1977-04-18· cited 1,211×
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 685×
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 579×
- Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court· 1941-01-13· cited 574×
- General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court· 1997-02-18· cited 447×
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 395×
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 361×
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court· 1932-05-16· cited 336×
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1954-05-03· cited 331×
- Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court· 1939-05-29· cited 320×
- National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 313×
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1989-01-10· cited 305×
- New York Ex Rel. Cohn v. GravesSupreme Court· 1937-03-01· cited 213×
- ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionSupreme Court· 1982-10-18· cited 213×
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw NationSupreme Court· 1995-06-14· cited 213×
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Missouri State Tax CommissionSupreme Court· 1968-03-11· cited 164×
- Connecticut General Life Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1938-01-31· cited 153×
- Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1929-11-25· cited 145×
- Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1994-06-20· cited 135×
- Cream of Wheat Co. v. County of Grand ForksSupreme Court· 1920-06-01· cited 101×
Other cases named Chase Manhattan Bank v. Gavin
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.