Second Circuit· 6/5/2000
Charles W. v. Maul
Citations
- 214 F.3d 350
- 2000 WL 713905
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendants did not violate the plaintiff’s due process rights when they confined him for up to 72 hours to evaluate him and determine whether to initiate civil commitment proceedings
- “[A] defendant is entitled to the shield of qualified immunity if the allegations of the complaint fail to state a claim that his conduct violated ‘clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.’ ”
- “State court decisions . . . are relevant and often persuasive.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cardamone, Jacobs, McMahon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Francis S. v. StoneSecond Circuit· 2000-08-09· cited 328×
- Quituizaca v. GarlandSecond Circuit· 2022-11-01· cited 145×
- Smith v. Local 819 I.B.T. Pension PlanSecond Circuit· 2002-05-20· cited 141×
- Sloley v. VanBramerSecond Circuit· 2019-12-12· cited 112×
- Hurd v. FredenburghSecond Circuit· 2021-01-12· cited 70×
- In Re Complete Management Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2001-03-30· cited 65×
- Sabir v. WilliamsSecond Circuit· 2022-06-17· cited 58×
- Cargo Partner AG v. Albatrans Inc.S.D. New York· 2002-03-13· cited 38×
- Dawson v. County of WestchesterS.D. New York· 2004-12-29· cited 33×
- Bear, Stearns Securities Corp. v. GreddS.D. New York· 2002-03-22· cited 27×
- Bullard v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2003-01-20· cited 26×
- In Re Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetler, A.S. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2001-11-02· cited 22×
- Ward v. Housatonic Area Regional Transit DistrictD. Connecticut· 2001-08-03· cited 20×
- Gorham-Dimaggio v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.N.D. New York· 2008-12-17· cited 18×
- LaSalle Bank National Ass'n v. Nomura Asset Capital Corp.S.D. New York· 2001-09-28· cited 15×
- Ruggles v. Wellpoint, Inc.N.D. New York· 2008-09-24· cited 15×
- Mental Hygiene Legal Service v. CuomoS.D. New York· 2011-03-29· cited 13×
- Johnson v. Newburgh Enlarged School DistrictSecond Circuit· 2001-01-31· cited 13×
- Brown v. City of OneontaSecond Circuit· 2000-12-18· cited 12×
- Washington v. United States Tennis Ass'nE.D. New York· 2003-09-29· cited 11×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 14,197×
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 5,104×
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 4,909×
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 3,290×
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 2,968×
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,725×
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court· 1999-05-24· cited 2,678×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 1,284×
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 1,231×
- Conn v. GabbertSupreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 836×
- Josephina Duchesne as Administratrix of the Estate of Pauline Perez v. Jule M. SugarmanSecond Circuit· 1977-11-08· cited 380×
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykSecond Circuit· 1996-04-19· cited 355×
- Kaluczky v. City of White PlainsSecond Circuit· 1995-06-08· cited 339×
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Second Circuit· 1993-04-06· cited 182×
- Francis v. CoughlinSecond Circuit· 1989-12-04· cited 141×
- Project Release v. PrevostFirst Circuit· 1983-10-24· cited 121×
- Woe v. CuomoSecond Circuit· 1984-02-22· cited 87×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.