Skip to main content

Charles v. State

Citations

  • 193 So. 3d 31
  • 2016 WL 1445443
  • 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing certiorari petition as premature where challenged reports of non-testifying experts had not yet been completed or reviewed in camera

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Suarez, Wells, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.