Belair v. Drew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “requiring the disclosure of claim file materials during the litigation of coverage issues would result in irreparable harm that cannot be adequately addressed on appeal”
• approving certiorari jurisdiction based on alleged unconstitutional infringement of “personal parental rights” and citing infringements of First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights as other injuries cognizable in certiorari
• declaring section 752.01(1)(b), unconstitutional as applied, where divorced parents opposed paternal grandmother's visitation
• declaring section 752.01(l)(b), unconstitutional as applied, where divorced parents opposed paternal grandmother’s visitation
• approving of Williams v. Spears, 719 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), which granted certiorari in a case involving grandparent visitation rights because \the parents' constitutional right to privacy was affected 'by the very continuance' of the proceedings in the trial court\
• \Common law certiorari is an extraordinary remedy and should not be used to circumvent the interlocutory appeal rule which authorizes appeal from only a few types of non-final orders.\ (quoting Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So. 2d 1097, 1098 (Fla. 1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).