Charles Raby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We permit the filing of a successive petition only if we conclude that [the petitioner’s] application makes a prima facie showing that it satisfies the strict requirements in § 2244(b)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Len Davis
  Fifth Circuit· 2020-08-21· cited 31×
• In Re: Larry Swearingen
  Fifth Circuit· 2019-08-16· cited 1×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• United States v. Bagley
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
• Giglio v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
• Kyles v. Whitley
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
• Strickler v. Greene
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
• McQuiggin v. Perkins
  Supreme Court· 2013-05-28· cited 3,838×
• California v. Trombetta
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
• Arizona v. Youngblood
  Supreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
• In Re: Wilson
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-03-16· cited 145×
• Raby v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-03-04· cited 140×
• Westley v. Johnson
  Fifth Circuit· 1996-05-15· cited 132×
• In Re Swearingen
  Fifth Circuit· 2009-01-26· cited 83×
• Montoya v. Johnson
  Fifth Circuit· 2000-09-14· cited 64×
• Reed v. Quarterman
  Fifth Circuit· 2007-10-09· cited 55×
• Lesoon v. Commissioner
  Supreme Court· 1998-11-16· cited 24×
• Robert Campbell
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-05-13· cited 22×
• Raby v. Davis
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-10-31· cited 13×