Charles Hess v. Biomet, Inc.

Oral argument

• Argued

  47 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• surveying language and history of article I, section 10 and determining no right to counsel existed during implied-consent procedures before charges filed
• surveying language and history of article I, section 10 and determining no right to counsel existed during implied-consent procedures before charges filed
• surveying language and history of article I, section 10 and determining no right to counsel existed during implied-consent procedures before charges filed
• “[W]e read section 804.20 together with the implied- consent provisions of Iowa Code chapter 321J.”
• “The Supreme Court employs a two-part test to determine whether the accused has a right to counsel. First, the right must have attached, which means that ‘formal judicial proceedings have begun.’ Second, it must be a ‘critical stage’ of the prosecution.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).