Skip to main content
· 7/14/1997

USA Life One Insurance v. Nuckolls

Citations

  • 682 N.E.2d 534
  • 1997 Ind. LEXIS 105
  • 1997 WL 385926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an insurer’s broad, literal reading of a coverage exclusion would produce an absurd result and construing the contract in favor of the insured
  • concluding that an insurer’s broad, literal reading of a coverage exclusion would produce an absurd result and construing the contract in favor of the insured
  • “When an insurance contract contains an ambiguity, it should be strictly construed against the insurance company.”
  • “When an insurance contract contains an ambiguity, it should be strictly construed against the insurance company.”
  • “If the language in the insurance policy is clear and unambiguous, then it should be given its plain and ordinary meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selby, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.