· 7/14/1997
USA Life One Insurance v. Nuckolls
Citations
- 682 N.E.2d 534
- 1997 Ind. LEXIS 105
- 1997 WL 385926
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that an insurer’s broad, literal reading of a coverage exclusion would produce an absurd result and construing the contract in favor of the insured
- concluding that an insurer’s broad, literal reading of a coverage exclusion would produce an absurd result and construing the contract in favor of the insured
- “When an insurance contract contains an ambiguity, it should be strictly construed against the insurance company.”
- “When an insurance contract contains an ambiguity, it should be strictly construed against the insurance company.”
- “If the language in the insurance policy is clear and unambiguous, then it should be given its plain and ordinary meaning.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selby, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.