Skip to main content
· 4/4/2024

Charitable DAF Fund v. Highland Captl Mgmt

Citations

  • 98 F.4th 170

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prisoner alleging a package rule violation did not sufficiently plead a substantive due process claim
  • concluding that even if 100 inmates received mail the plaintiff was not allowed to receive, due to “a breakdown in mailroom procedures,” the reasonableness of the regulations “would be no less constitutional”
  • holding regulations defining legal mail as correspondence only from an attorney, judge or elected official have been approved by the United States Supreme Court
  • noting it is a violation of substantive due process to engage “in conduct that is so outrageous that it shocks the conscience or otherwise offends judicial notions of fairness, or is offensive to human dignity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.