Skip to main content

Chapman v. State

Citations

  • 16 P.3d 432
  • 117 Nev. 1
  • 117 Nev. Adv. Rep. 1
  • 2001 Nev. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding trial judge’s denial of defendant’s motion to subject victim to psychiatric evaluation because clinical forensic interviewer who interviewed the victim concerning the incidents of sexual abuse did not qualify as an expert
  • \A child-victim's prior sexual experiences may be admissible to counteract the jury's perception that a young child would not have the knowledge or experience necessary to describe a sexual assault unless it had actually happened.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Agosti, Leavitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.