Orfield v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an accomplice must be more than merely present; they must be implicated in, cooperate with, or aid or abet the crime, and the 2 Maresca v. State, 103 Nev. 669, 673, 748 P.2d 3, 6 (1987
• stating that an accomplice must be more than merely present; they must be implicated in, cooperate with, or aid or abet the crime, and the 2 Maresca v. State, 103 Nev. 669, 673, 748 P.2d 3, 6 (1987
• stating that an accomplice must be more than merely present; they must be implicated in, cooperate with, or aid or abet the crime, and the 2 Maresca v. State, 103 Nev. 669, 673, 748 P.2d 3, 6 (1987) (noting we do not consider arguments that are not adequately briefed
• stating that an accomplice must be more than merely present; they must be implicated in, cooperate with, or aid or abet the crime, and the 2 Maresca v. State, 103 Nev. 669, 673, 748 P.2d 3, 6 (1987) (noting we do not consider arguments that are not adequately briefed
• explaining which witnesses may properly be considered 28 accomplices

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).