Chapman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court violated former OCGA § 17-8-57 where, in ruling on an objection, the court indicated that a witness had made a positive identification of the defendant, which was a key issue in the case
• raising, but not reaching, “the issue of whether curative instructions given to the jury by the court can avoid the harsh mandate of a new trial contemplated by OCGA § 17-8-57” and cases cited therein as implying this result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Patel v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-09-24· cited 61×
• Burney v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-10-17· cited 54×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-08-23· cited 9×
• Crenshaw v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-05-16· cited 2×
• Redd v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-08-06· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Isaacs v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1989-11-30· cited 201×
• Wilson v. Southern Railway Co.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-04-14· cited 39×
• McCoy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-02-10· cited 31×
• Zellner v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-01-10· cited 15×
• Skipper v. Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-11-19· cited 14×
• Nance v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-06-24· cited 3×
• Black v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-05-29· cited 2×