Skip to main content
· 9/14/1992

Chapin v. Hulse

Citations

  • 599 N.E.2d 217
  • 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 1433
  • 1992 WL 217836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that nothing in Trial Rule 60(B) “contemplates a subsequent change in law as grounds for relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Barteau, Buchanan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.