Georgos v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a final judgment disposes of all issues as to all parties thereby ending the particular case and that it leaves nothing for future determination
• stating that \a final judgment `disposes of all issues as to all parties thereby ending the particular case'\ and \leaves nothing for further determination.\
• observing that a final judgment disposes of all issues as to all parties and leaves nothing for future determination
• stating that “a final judgment ‘disposes of all issues as to all parties thereby ending the particular case’ ” and “leaves nothing for further determination.”
• explaining that the trial court cannot “confer appellate jurisdiction over an order that is not appealable either as a final judgment or under [T.R.] 54(B)”
• explaining that a trial court “cannot confer appellate jurisdiction over an order that is not appealable either as a final judgment or under Trial Rule 54(B)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).