Skip to main content
· 9/24/2007

Chapel v. Derringer (In Re Derringer)

Citations

  • 375 B.R. 903
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3222
  • 2007 WL 2758561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing “postponement” of foreclosure sale and holding that “[wjhen a foreclosure sale is initially scheduled postpetition, case law holds that actions in furtherance of the foreclosure sale are violations of the automatic stay.”
  • distinguishing continuing a foreclosure sale during the pendency of a bankruptcy case, which does not violate the automatic stay, from a creditor’s mailing of a foreclosure notice to the debtor and filing it in state court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Michael, Nugent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.