McHenry v. Key Bank (In Re McHenry)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that punitive damages are also appropriate if the creditor engaged in “egregious, intentional misconduct.”
• stating that punitive damages may only be awarded if actual damages have been proven
• eiting In re Roberts, 175 B.R. 339, 343 (9th Cir.BAP 1994)
• finding a willful stay violation where creditor repossessed automobile but refusing to award damages because debtors intended to return the vehicle, and their inconvenience and annoyance was insufficient to warrant a damages award
• reviewing a 8 willful violation of the automatic stay
• construing § 362(h), the predecessor of § 362(k)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).