· 2/29/2008
Chao v. Roy's Construction, Inc.
Citations
- 517 F.3d 180
- 22 OSHC (BNA) 1113
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4395
- 2008 WL 540245
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- same, when there were inconsistencies between statements during an administrative proceeding and a later court action but nothing else “that justif[ies] application” of judicial estoppel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Nygaard, Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.