Skip to main content
· 2/29/2008

Chao v. Roy's Construction, Inc.

Citations

  • 517 F.3d 180
  • 22 OSHC (BNA) 1113
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4395
  • 2008 WL 540245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • same, when there were inconsistencies between statements during an administrative proceeding and a later court action but nothing else “that justif[ies] application” of judicial estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Nygaard, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.