Skip to main content
· 7/29/2008

In Re Carco Electronics

Citations

  • 536 F.3d 211
  • 87 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1637
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16041
  • 50 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 79
  • 2008 WL 2908935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting \strong statements” in Supreme Court opinions suggesting that a prior Third Circuit decision was \flawed” but stating that overrul ing that decision \must be left to the wise counsel of the Court en banc\
  • “It is axiomatic that discovery orders are not final orders . . . for purposes of obtaining appellate jurisdiction under [§ 1291].” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Nygaard, Stafford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.