Skip to main content
· 7/19/1965

Chaney v. Burgess

Citations

  • 143 S.E.2d 521
  • 246 S.C. 261
  • 1965 S.C. LEXIS 210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • while South Carolina does not expressly recognize res ipsa loquitur, one may prove negligence with circumstantial evidence
  • \the so-called doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply in this state\
  • “the so-called doctrine of res ipsa lo-quitur does not apply in this state”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Taylor, Moss, Bussey, Brailsford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.