Gulledge v. McLaughlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding cumulative testimony was an insufficient ground for reversal even though the trial court erred in permitting a non-expert patrolman to testify
• stating \a long line of South Carolina decisions has excluded the opinions of investigating police officers in automobile accident cases\ and listing cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).