Champagnie v. WE O'Neil Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a court should not refuse to apply the law of a foreign state, however unlike its own, unless it is contrary to pure morals and abstract justice”
• contrary to the position taken by this Court in Zarnas
• contrary to the position taken by this Court in Zarnas
• following Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws Sec. 188(2) (1971)
• most-significant-contacts test applied in action challenging validity of an indemnity contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).