Diamond State Insurance v. Chester-Jensen Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no bodily injury coverage where employees’ injuries were not a necessary causal link in the injury to the underlying plaintiffs
• “Appellant’s proposed interpretation would distort the meaning of this provision and extend its reach so as to provide coverage for any liability where bodily injury is a tangential factor.”
• “Mere allegations of repair and modification without any allegations of physical injury are insufficient to invoke coverage under the physical injury prong of the property damage provision.”
• “place of issuance” found to be the insurers’ home office
• discussing Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws, section 193

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).