Chambers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have generally required that the petitioner factually support his claims with admissible evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chambers v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 70×
• Berry Alexander Davis, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-01-08

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• State v. Knaffla
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-06-25· cited 418×
• Leake v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-16· cited 146×
• State v. Chambers
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-04· cited 82×
• State v. Dahlin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-05-12· cited 67×
• Ferguson v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 55×
• State v. Rhodes
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-06-07· cited 42×
• Sanchez-Diaz v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-12-24· cited 30×
• Ives v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-01-23· cited 27×
• McKenzie v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-07· cited 12×
• Sessions v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-08-07· cited 6×