Skip to main content

Chambers v. State

Citations

  • 924 So. 2d 975
  • 2006 WL 932578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that inflammatory statements that invoked the “sympathy or anger of the jury” may have improperly “influenced the jury to reach a more severe verdict than it would have otherwise rendered”
  • recognizing that inflammatory statements that invoked the “sympathy or anger of the jury” may have improperly “influenced the jury to reach a more severe verdict than it would have otherwise rendered”
  • reiterating that \convictions for both armed burglary of a dwelling and burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery violate principles of double jeopardy because they were based upon a single forced entry and involved a single victim\
  • finding the prosecutorial commentary on the defendant’s immoral and improper relationship with 16-year-old victim in burglary, assault, and robbery prosecution that did not involve the age of the victim was an improper and irrelevant character attack
  • “[T]he prosecutor’s expressed indignation at the ... need for her to face questioning by defense counsel as to her credibility was improper.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altenbernd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.