Chalmers v. Kanawyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that supreme court held that “in the absence of fraud or collusion, a money judgment confessed to by an insured is binding on the insurer in a garnishment action if the settlement is reasonable and prudent” (citing Miller, 316 N.W.2d at 734–35)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).