· 6/3/1977
Laidlaw v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark
Citations
- 255 N.W.2d 807
- 6 A.L.R. 4th 413
- 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1539
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming award of total disability benefits to injured attorney, even though he continued to earn substantial income
- affirming award of total disability benefits to injured attorney, even though he continued to earn substantial income
- involving interpretation of the phrase “period for which the (Company) is liable” and holding that an insured’s income is not relevant to a finding of total disability
- analyzing a 23 policy in which payments “were to continue indefinitely for any general disability which 24 prevented plaintiff from engaging in any gainful employment for which he was suited”
- “The usual rule of construction most favorable to the insured does not apply to a [policy] provision required by statute.”
- \The usual rule of construction most favorable to the insured does not apply to a provision required by statute.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas J. Stahler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.