Skip to main content
· 6/3/1977

Laidlaw v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark

Citations

  • 255 N.W.2d 807
  • 6 A.L.R. 4th 413
  • 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming award of total disability benefits to injured attorney, even though he continued to earn substantial income
  • affirming award of total disability benefits to injured attorney, even though he continued to earn substantial income
  • involving interpretation of the phrase “period for which the (Company) is liable” and holding that an insured’s income is not relevant to a finding of total disability
  • analyzing a 23 policy in which payments “were to continue indefinitely for any general disability which 24 prevented plaintiff from engaging in any gainful employment for which he was suited”
  • “The usual rule of construction most favorable to the insured does not apply to a [policy] provision required by statute.”
  • \The usual rule of construction most favorable to the insured does not apply to a provision required by statute.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas J. Stahler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.