Ninth Circuit· 7/25/2019
Cftc v. Monex Credit Co.
Citations
- 931 F.3d 966
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that courts 19 may “consider an affirmative defense on a motion to dismiss when there is some 20 obvious bar to securing relief on the face of the complaint” (internal quotation marks 21 removed)
- noting importance of distinction 23 between a claim element and an affirmative defense “because Rule 8 does not require plaintiffs to 24 plead around affirmative defenses”
- “Rule 8 does not require plaintiffs to plead around affirmative defenses.” (citing Jones, 549 U.S. at 216)
- “[D]ismissal based on an affirmative defense is permitted when the complaint establishes the defense”
- “[D]ismissal based on an affirmative defense is permitted when the complaint establishes the defense”
- “Rule 8 does not require plaintiffs to plead around affirmative defenses.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Alexander Hebrard v. Jeremy NofzigerNinth Circuit· 2024-01-11· cited 83×
- Jensen v. BrownNinth Circuit· 2025-03-10· cited 22×
- United States v. Jeffrey PageNinth Circuit· 2024-06-26· cited 12×
- York County v. Hp, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2023-04-11· cited 2×
- Gable v. GableWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2021-06-01
- United States v. Jeffrey PageNinth Circuit· 2024-09-12
- Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation v. Teck Cominco Metals LtdNinth Circuit· 2025-09-03
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court· 2007-01-22· cited 10,443×
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court· 2001-02-27· cited 1,439×
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 1,089×
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USANinth Circuit· 2003-01-31· cited 720×
- Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court· 2012-05-21· cited 575×
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court· 2006-03-21· cited 550×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ZandfordSupreme Court· 2002-06-03· cited 406×
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 393×
- United States v. WoodsSupreme Court· 2013-12-03· cited 317×
- ASARCO, LLC v. Union Pacific RailroadNinth Circuit· 2014-08-27· cited 301×
- J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.Supreme Court· 2001-12-10· cited 254×
- United States v. First City National Bank of HoustonSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 234×
- Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power LaboratorySupreme Court· 2008-06-19· cited 194×
- Sarmad Syed v. M-I, LLCNinth Circuit· 2017-01-20· cited 151×
- Lawson v. FMR LLCSupreme Court· 2014-03-04· cited 144×
- Fayelynn Sams v. Yahoo! Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2013-04-15· cited 95×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.