Fayelynn Sams v. Yahoo! Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it is proper to consider extrinsic evidence 12 where the parties did not dispute the authenticity and the substance of the evidence was 13 critical to plaintiff’s claims
• finding proper to consider extrinsic 28 evidence where the parties did not dispute the authenticity and substance of the evidence 1 Defendant also asks the Court to take judicial notice of Defendant’s (1) calendar for school 2 year 2022–2023 and (2
• “For even assuming, 16 arguendo, that these subpoenas were ultimately invalid, they bore all of the indicia of 17 lawful authority.”
• allegations of the complaint by themselves must, establish the defense
• rejecting the Freedman court’s formulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).