Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 1/15/1973

Cervantes v. Time, Inc.

Citations

  • 409 U.S. 1125
  • 93 S. Ct. 939
  • 35 L. Ed. 2d 257
  • 1973 U.S. LEXIS 3675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • action by former employees to discontinue pension fund and distribute assets to beneficiaries upon closing of plant
  • contempt convictions for refusal to answer sweeping grand jury questions reversed; rehearing subsequent to Branzburg denied
  • contempt convictions for refusal to answer sweeping grand jury questions reversed; rehearing subsequent to Branzburg denied
  • court affirmed grant of reporter’s motion for summary judgment in libel action brought by mayor against magazine holding that it was proper to deny mayor opportunity to examine anonymous news sources
  • defendant reporter’s privilege upheld in lihel suit where action is patently without merit
  • employees unreasonably relied on union official’s statements about pension payments where authority to determine the use of pension fund rested solely with retirement board and where pension fund agreement provided that decision of the board would be conclusive and binding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cervantes v. Time, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.