Cenarrusa v. Andrus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Idaho Const, art. IV, § 11 (empowering governor “to disapprove of any item or items of any bill making appropriations of money”) means that “he may disapprove only items of appropriation of money”
• \Obviously the word item can not be given different meanings within the same sentence.\
• \Obviously the word item can not be given different meanings within the same sentence.\
• \Obviously the word item can not be given different meanings within the same sentence.\
• “There is no provision in our Constitution governing the time within which the legislature must present bills to the governor, and it is not for this Court to impose any limitation as to time.”
• item means \item[] of appropriation of money\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jubelirer v. Rendell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-08-19· cited 98×
• Gilbert v. Gladden
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-29· cited 75×
• Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Lawerence Denney
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2015-11-20· cited 50×
• State Ex Rel. Link v. Olson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-11-06· cited 43×
• Washington State Legislature v. Lowry
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-02-27· cited 41×
• State ex rel. Ohio General Assembly v. Brunner
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-08-01· cited 39×
• Management Council of the Wyoming Legislature v. Geringer
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1998-02-11· cited 28×
• Brewer v. Burns
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2009-08-13· cited 27×
• Alaska Legislative Council v. Knowles
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-04-20· cited 26×
• State Ex Rel. Wiseman v. Oklahoma Board of Corrections
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1980-07-15· cited 22×
• Opinion of the Justices to the House of Representatives
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-07-23· cited 19×
• Municipality of Anchorage v. Repasky
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-10-26· cited 17×
• Hunt v. Hubbert
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-10-02· cited 11×
• In Re Karcher
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1983-05-11· cited 6×
• Perry v. Decker
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-02-03· cited 4×
• MGT. COUNCIL OF LEGISLATURE v. Geringer
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1998-02-11
• Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Lawerence Denney
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2015-09-10
• Opinion No. (2001)
  Nebraska Attorney General Reports· 2001-06-25

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Sego v. Kirkpatrick
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-07-19· cited 138×
• Fulmore v. Lane
  Texas Supreme Court· 1911-11-22· cited 71×
• Commonwealth v. Dodson
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1940-10-14· cited 68×
• Edwards v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1932-05-31· cited 66×
• State v. Holder
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1898-03-15· cited 60×
• Bengzon v. Secretary of Justice of Philippine Islands
  Supreme Court· 1937-01-04· cited 52×
• Fairfield v. Foster
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1923-04-14· cited 50×
• State Ex Rel. Turner v. Iowa State Highway Commission
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1971-04-09· cited 49×
• Mills v. Porter
  Montana Supreme Court· 1924-01-11· cited 44×
• State Ex Rel. Dickson v. Saiz
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1957-01-23· cited 38×
• State Ex Rel. Cason v. Bond
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1973-06-06· cited 37×
• Worthen v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1974-08-06· cited 27×
• State Ex Rel. Brassey v. Hanson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1959-08-03· cited 24×
• Fitzsimmons v. Leon
  First Circuit· 1944-04-06· cited 21×
• Hartness v. Black
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1921-05-03· cited 21×
• Katerndahl v. Daugherty
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1917-04-25· cited 13×
• City of Helena v. Omholt
  Montana Supreme Court· 1970-05-01· cited 11×