Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs breaking off negotiations with defendant’s competitor was decisive of the case
• “[A]n estoppel, if appropriately applied in this case, would also preclude [the defendant] from asserting the affirmative defense of the Statute of Frauds.”
• commercial property owner loses alternative sales opportunities, time, and expenses as the result of protracted and misleading inducements by a prospective commercial purchaser of his properly
• defendant’s statement that the home office would approve the deal constituted actionable fraud
• explaining the elements of estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).