Kuzmeskus v. Pickup Motor Co. Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is a settled principle of contract law that ‘[a] promise made with an understood intention that it is not to be legally binding, but only expressive of a present intention, is not a contract’ ”
• “It is a settled principle of contract law that ‘[a] promise made with an understood intention that it is not to be legally binding, but only expressive of a present intention, is not a contract’”
• “It is a settled principle of contract law that ‘[a] promise made with an understood intention that it is not to be legally binding, but only expressive of a present intention, is not a contract’ ”
• “It is a settled principle of contract law that ‘[a] promise made with an understood intention that it is not to be legally binding, but only expressive of a present intention, is not a contract’ ”
• contract proffered by company's general manager, which contained clause requiring authorization by seller's corporate officer, and blank space for officer's signature, held to be \no more than an invitation or request to give orders on the terms and conditions therein stated\
• “It is a settled principle of contract law that ‘[a] promise made with an understood intention that it is not to be legally binding, but only expressive of a present intention, is not a contract,’ ” Levenson v. L.M.I. Realty Corp., 31 Mass.App.Ct. 127, 130 (1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).