CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC v. Return Path, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court had authority to correct patent where three plausible corrections existed but all three resulted in the same claim scope
• “It is well- settled law that, in a patent infringement suit, a district court may correct an obvious error in a patent claim.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.
  Third Circuit· 2012-03-16· cited 73×
• Cbt Flint Partners, LLC v. Return Path, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-12-13· cited 41×
• Pavo Solutions LLC v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2022-06-03· cited 26×
• Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2018-08-28· cited 9×
• Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
  N.D. California· 2013-01-29· cited 9×
• Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2015-04-20· cited 6×
• H-W Technology, LC v. Overstock.com. Inc.
  N.D. Texas· 2013-09-23· cited 4×
• Finnerty v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 2012-10-16· cited 3×
• Senju Pharmaceutical Co. v. Lupin Ltd.
  D. New Jersey· 2015-11-18· cited 2×
• CBT Flint Partners, LLC v. Return Path, Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 2012-04-27· cited 2×
• In re AndroGel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
  N.D. Georgia· 2012-10-30· cited 1×
• Fitbit, Inc. v. Valencell, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2020-07-08
• Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. v. Johnson Crushers International, Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2011-11-28
• Canatex Completion Solutions, Inc. v. Wellmatics, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2025-11-12

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
• Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 2,940×
• Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
• Exxon Research and Engineering Company v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2001-09-19· cited 225×
• I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.
  Supreme Court· 1926-11-22· cited 202×
• Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-01-04· cited 140×
• Novo Industries, L.P., Plaintiff-Cross v. Micro Molds Corporation, and Oscar Helver
  Federal Circuit· 2003-12-05· cited 119×
• Honeywell International, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, and Hyosung Corporation and Hyosung (America), Inc., Intervenors
  Federal Circuit· 2003-10-23· cited 105×
• Ultimax Cement Manufacturing Corp. v. CTS Cement Manufacturing Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-12-03· cited 67×
• CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC v. Return Path, Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 2008-07-10· cited 5×
• CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC v. Return Path, Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 2009-12-30· cited 5×