Skip to main content

Cates v. State

Citations

  • 120 S.W.3d 352
  • 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 829
  • 2003 WL 22682479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that reviewing courts are not limited to examination of four corners of affidavit if there are allegations that affidavit contains \known falsehoods\
  • explaining that reviewing courts are not limited to examination of four corners of affidavit if there are allegations that affidavit contains “known falsehoods”
  • stating that trial court is required to go behind affidavit’s four corners during Franks hearing only “if a defendant has made a substantial preliminary showing of deliberate falsity”
  • setting forth the distinction between a suppression hearing and a Franks hearing where additional evidence may be admitted to show the falsity of assertions within an affidavit
  • setting forth the distinction between a suppression hearing and a Franks hearing where additional evidence may be admitted to show the falsity of assertions within an affidavit
  • setting forth the distinction between a suppression hearing and a Franks hearing where additional evidence may be admitted to show the falsity of assertions within an affidavit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Hervey, Holcomb, Keller, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

108 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.